thinking on thinking · S1E6

Thinking on Learning to Change our Thoughts

October 05, 202233 min ideas

listen elsewhere Spotify → Apple Podcasts →

Is the way you do one thing, the way you do everything? It’s a common Buddhist saying but this week, we examine if it is actually true, and we talk about how we learn things: from the people around us, from practice, from exposure and from adapting models from culture. We also explore how persistence and learning are connected to our expectations of outcomes.

This was a super fun conversation because we end up diving into things that are core to what joyus is about, and we discuss how we have arrived at some of those learnings in our own lives. And there is some stuff about competing with duolingo, which definitely we have never done ourselves. Nope. Never.

Theme music is by Steve Combs, available here: https://freemusicarchive.org/music/Steve_Combs/Steve_Combs_Premium_Preview_EP_1325/06__Steve_Com

notable moments

With our phones in our hands, it's so much easier to distract ourselves whenever we get that uncomfortable feeling of having to do something we don't want to do.

My family has this strange competitiveness. If someone starts doing something, everyone else thinks: you're not stopping because I'm not doing it, so I better start too.

Read full transcript

I feel like in the gay community, I feel like there's more of this like, oh, we're gay, we can talk to each other, right? And it's interesting because it means like, otherwise people tend to cluster, you know? You meet people who have similar backgrounds to you or work in similar fields to you. And so like through like this over gay connection, like I feel like I've met a lot of people who are

very different backgrounds or just different lives than me. Hi, I'm Devere. Hi, I'm Kahran. And this is Thinking on Thinking. There are certain skills where if you do learn them once,

they give you rewards in multiple places. So for example, if you learn how to figure out what to invest yourself in, then every next thing that you put effort in is going to be just so much easier. If you learn how to do learning more efficiently, then it would be just so much easier to learn a new thing.

If you figure out how to, I mean, of course, there are some things where it would be a point of diminishing returns, where it's like, okay, investing more energy in this thing is not worth it. So for example, if you learn quickly about, okay, when I am trying to learn something new, what are the things that I need to do? Maybe I need to consume this thing.

Maybe I need to surround myself with this particular kind of conversations. Maybe I need to revise certain things. Like depending on what you are trying to learn and how you're trying to learn and how actively you're trying to learn, just like what kind of question should I be asking? I'm just taking the example of learning how to learn.

So if I brought you to one of the other things we were thinking about today, like do you feel like being in a learning state is an equilibrium state? Or do you feel like a learning state is always a state that's taking you to a different state? It depends on are you okay with the first derivative, the second derivative or the third derivative? Which one are you okay with stabilizing at? Did that make sense?

You might have to say a few more words. Okay, so when you look at constant acceleration graphs, it's a straight line, not a straight line which is moving upwards, right? It's a straight line which is moving horizontally. But the velocity of that same graph is a linear plotting up. And the distance curve for the same thing would be a quadratic curve.

Yeah, absolutely. So now you have to think, do I want the distance in this case, which would be like how much stuff I know? Do I want that to be linear? Do I want the pace at which I am learning to be linear, which would be velocity? Or do I want to consistently improve my capacity to learn, which would be acceleration in this case?

I see what you're saying. That is interesting. You feel like it's possible to invest into that last category to improve your capacity to learn? I would imagine that it would be possible to go for higher order derivatives also. I don't know if I am able to go there, but I know that it would be possible because a lot of this has to do with how much you already know. Once you cross a certain amount of knowledge, you just arrive at a second stage.

And then you don't have to... It's just not as tiring. It's a little bit like if you do some amount of cardio and you go do a new cardio workout, you will need to do some learning around just the basics. But because your lung capacity is amazing, you can just do so much... You can just grow so much faster and you actually do put in less effort. I think watching Gaurav drive has been an interesting exercise of that notion.

For me, I learned to drive when I was 15. And you learn a lot. And then you stop applying most of it in your conscious mind. You're able to drive. Even if I was to drive a new car or drive a different kind of car, it's not hard to pick up. But for the initial learning, it's a lot for your mind to figure out that this is the kind of things I pay attention to, these are the kind of things I sub-process, these are the kind of things I can batch process.

It's interesting. It's a partially... It's like your brain learning to build neural network. Right? Basically, your brain needs more and more data until it just knows what paths to take. One of the business coaches that I had worked with, she had this model of you start from unconscious incompetence. The most painful part of the process is conscious incompetence. When you know you are not good at this thing, but you can no longer unsee the fact that how bad you are.

And then you move to conscious competence, where you know you are doing this well, but it's a little hard for you every time it requires effort from you. But it's sort of like your effort requires keeps going lower once you move out of the conscious competence level. And once you are at the unconscious competence level, you don't have to think about how to do it. That's when we say muscle memory. The thing has fully transferred into your... What is it? System

one thinking. Right? Yeah. Yeah. I found it to be a super helpful model because I think at that time when I was talking to her, I was struggling a lot with some of these things that I was encountering which were new and I hadn't seen them before. Like there's notions of how what you do with knowledge, how you kind of apply it into your... Or rather, I was encountering a lot of knowledge that was making me feel conscious incompetence and I was not ready to face that.

So should we switch gears a little bit and then talk about the flip side? Okay. How much do you think on a daily basis you have energy to waste on things that make you tired? It's interesting. You know, if we start to drill into it even a little bit, like for example, I've been trying to write poetry every morning, right? And I find it's very difficult for me to first of all write for more than like even just 15 to 20 minutes at a time,

right? And that's like if I create myself a very conducive environment, there's like a certain kind of music I like to listen to. It's a certain hour of the day, right? If I try and create myself that kind of environment, I can sit for maybe 20 minutes. Outside of that, it's just, yeah, like I don't have the energy for it, right? Something about it, like I can kind of like force myself to sit for a while, but it just it doesn't... It's very hard for me, right? Like it's really kind of

like it takes a lot more energy just to like keep myself focused on it than it does before that. So I feel like there's a certain... So that's where I think if I started to split it up a little bit, there's like a... To use maybe like... So there was a card game called Magic the Gathering that for some reason came to my mind, right? And so you'd have different types of mana in this game, right? And depending on what kind of like creature you were trying to summon or spell you were trying

to perform, there would be like a mana cost that was that was could be any type of mana. And then there would be a specific mana cost, right? So I feel a little bit like that, right? Where I feel like there are certain things that require specific energy. And then there's also... There also may have like a requirement of general energy. And I also feel like sometimes you can use general energy for specific energy, but it'll be less efficient. Interesting. I had never thought about it like

that. But this is such a good example, because like sometimes you do feel like you're out of mana when you are trying to do something and you just... Your brain just will decide that you don't want to do it. Okay, so it's making me think of two different things. One part is... So sometimes there are things that your brain is afraid of or like feels apprehensive about. And so it will try to scare you into not having the inspiration or not having the energy or not having the capacity, because it

would be like, oh, but what if I look on my phone right now? I wonder what my partner is doing? I wonder what my mom is doing? I wonder what that person who asked me for a specific link to a specific band is thinking about. I haven't replied to them. Did I get any new mails? Like, especially with our phones in our hands, it's like so much easier to distract ourselves whenever we get that feeling. And then there is stuff which is like admin work, right? So for example, if you write poetry,

I'm sure you feel fulfilled in some parts that I created something. So it's not something that just drains your mana. It also replenishes your mana. But if you have to, I don't know, run errands or something like that, in most people's cases, it just drains mana. Well, what I usually end up doing is I will wait until it has become like a situation in my life. Like for example, I had a return I made yesterday that Goryeva and I had sitting in the garage now, now with the fact that it's gone,

right? There's neither a bag in my car nor a bag hiding in that closet nor a bag downstairs of like where it's hidden all these different things I needed to do for myself. I feel a great sense of accomplishment. I'm like goodness, that was just I'm so proud of us. Is it accomplishment or relief? It's relief not to see the boxes. And then also I feel a sense of accomplishment that we did it in the way we did because it was just very clever. Like we yeah, we were just we managed to combine a

lot of things together. We were very efficient. Interesting. Because like I don't think huh? And so it's possible you could just have to do it in a way that it does something that you care about. Like I feel very pleased we did something very efficient. And also because the efficiency was a metric that has made me feel pleased. Like it was good that in the store the whole experience was also very efficient. So like I managed to like, like we put it into our day in a really nice way

and then we also managed to like the experience was great. So then my net is I'm like, ah, yes. Thing I was dreading is great. So there is definitely a sense of relief too. Because like I don't think that I try to gain. Well, using our previous term, I don't think I try to gain mana out of a lot of these things. Even if I try, I'm generally good at structuring things in a way that would motivate me. But there are some of these things where I feel like it gives me

back nothing. And so there is no point. Like I could optimize for them to bring me happiness. I could optimize for them to bring me joy. But are these the things that I want to derive joy out of? So it's interesting that you say that because I mean the answer could be you should derive joy out of everything. But somehow in my buffer, it just like does not register. My brain is like, that's not the category of things that I want to feel good after doing. For some more context,

recently I was watching a video where this person was talking about two different kind of personalities in context of people who play hard games. And there is a particular personality which tries to avoid loss. And another personality which is looking to win. And people who try to avoid loss, they are very tenacious, they do not give up until they are sort of exhausted basically for the lack of a better term. And they might have one or they might not have,

but they stay with the task. People who are the ones who are trying to win, they might jump from task to task, they might play a game for a while and then move to another game and then come back to the previous one. The win rates tend to be way better for people who are trying to win rather than people who are trying to avoid losing. Even though the effort perception is way higher for people who are trying to avoid losing. And a very, so a lot of these

kind of studies come out. But a very interesting thing that this guy said was, maybe you are I think they called it a promoter or a preventer, something, some stuff like that. I don't remember the exact names that he used. But he basically was like, maybe in gaming you are a particular kind of person who goes for winning. But maybe in your social relationships, you're trying to avoid losing. And maybe in your work, you are trying to win. Like you have to think, where am I

exhibiting what kind of behavior? Because it could change depending on the domain. And I found that notion very interesting, because generally the way even you were talking about personality tests and generally the way they say is there, I would say one of their core hypothesis or axioms is the way you do one thing is the way you do everything. But that's not true. Like, that might be true for some people who care about that kind of consistency in their personality. But I would say that like,

even for those people, they might be at the 80% compliance with their personality, even at the best of times. And then there would be people who change their personality fairly frequently depending on their moods, depending on how they're feeling, depending on the situation they are in. Right? Like if you're the kind of person who loves hanging out with five of their close friends, are you an introvert or an extrovert? You don't want to do loud things. But you love

hanging out with all the five of these people together also. It doesn't drain you. But then if you were forced to go to a party, it does drain you. Like there are so many different ways to look at it. So when I'm thinking about equilibrium, and this is not I wouldn't say I have assimilated this mental model completely. But it's an interesting thing to think about what kind of equilibrium am I seeking in this situation? And what kind of equilibrium am I trying to drive

towards? Because it changes from project to project as well. Like the kind of work that for example, I'm trying to do with Charu is not the same that the kind of work that I'm trying to do with you. And I've become more cognizant of it as I've been working with people who are close to me more, that oh, my requirements from each project are also different. That's really interesting. Something that we've talked about, like in how the queer community

is in the US and in India, like there's different like expectations of what kind of relationships people are looking for and how they want and what they want from them. But I think that the interesting thing about being part of the queer community is that people don't really assign their expectations of how relationships should be to you, right? Like people aren't really like looking and saying, oh, you should be with this kind of person, at least in my experience, like

people are not so much telling me that kind of thing, like, oh, you know, the right kind of husband for you is going to like have these kinds of characteristics. Whereas I do think that's a lot more common in the street community, right? Like that people will be like, oh, you know, you made the wrong one last time, this time you need to be thinking more like this way. And even this kind of like looking and saying like, oh, like, you know, for as you were kind of

saying, like for whatever reason, maybe you're playing not to lose right now. And that's like could be a way that you're the way that you're kind of protecting yourself or the way that you're thinking about how you what kind of people you want to approach or be approached by. But it's very disconcerting, I think for other people who then look at you and are like, oh, you should be playing in the way I think you should be playing, right? Right? Like one of the places that you

start to feel dissidence with your friends in close groups of circles is when you are in a different equilibrium state than them, I think, right? Like when you're working out more learning more or like just doing stuff, right? People like it's weird to people who are not doing that. And they feel kind of almost threatened by it. I found, or at least like kind of a strangely shamed. Like again, it's kind of interesting to for me to like watch my family because like,

whatever someone who behaves very differently than like the rest of my family who grew up in a very different environment. And so one of the things he really likes to do is he does do a lingo every day. And now my, my parents both do a lingo every day too for like extended periods. And just like, I mean, it's really nice to see they're all learning different languages. It's very entertaining to me. But right, like it's I think the my family, particularly we have this

strange competitiveness, right? And it's like, Oh, you're doing something, prove it. Now, what will I do? Well, you're not stopping because I'm not doing it. So I guess I better start doing something too. Wow, that is one way to read it. I mean, I also think that I have felt very confused when it comes to queer relationships as well. Because it's not like I'm not status conscious at all. I have grown up in India, I'm definitely fairly status conscious. But what does can do when it's a

queer relationship versus when it's a heteron relationship, it's much easier when it's a heteron relationship, guys supposed to do this girl is supposed to do this, this is what's supposed to happen. But then you're in a queer setup, and you're like, I don't care, but I also don't have heuristics about this thing. And like being around you and God has definitely helped there's like another friend of mine who is queer, and I'm like pretty close to him. And he often

says this that, oh, you'd often find that queer people tend to have larger age gaps, or they might have race gaps, they will have a lot more other gaps between themselves, because they are not too different in terms of their gendered experiences. And I found that very, very interesting. Because there is some way in which you are so close to each other, that in other ways, you could be so much different from each other. And you'd still have compatibility.

And it has been very interesting to just think about, okay, should I make my own heuristics, should I not? And I think that also happens, right? So for example, with your family, it might just be that there has been never the heuristics of we heuristic of we can do things consistently. But seeing God have do things consistently, it's like, Oh, this is possible. Like how I said, being around you guys, a couple of new friends that I've made and my siblings working out so much more, I have

started working out and it just feels much more natural to me now. I don't feel worried, like the fact that I'm injured and I can't work out, I feel very sad about that. I don't feel like, I have to go to gym again. I just feel like, when can I go again? Right. So it might just be that your parents are just thinking, Hmm, this is possible. I should also do this, not I have to defeat this person. I didn't quite mean it like this person, excuse me.

That's very funny. It's interesting you say that because one of the things I was talking to this older queer, queer lady friend of mine about was how I feel like in the gay community, I feel like there's more of this like, Oh, we're gay, we can talk to each other, right? And it's interesting because it means like, otherwise people tend to cluster, you know, you meet people who have similar backgrounds to you or work in similar fields to you. And so like through like this

over gay connection, like I feel like I've met a lot of people who are very different backgrounds or just different lives than me. Bangler has like, you know, a couple of different groups, like there's a there's a running group or really a breakfast group, the running is very little that meets on Sundays. And like kind of different WhatsApp groups. But even like when I go to a new place, right, like you can kind of just open an app and chat with someone. I don't know, I feel

like I wonder about whether like the rest of the queer community has started to to like use the fact that you always have a conversation opener, right, you always have something to kind of like start something like to use it as a strength. It's interesting that you say it the way you were though and that like, how like people want there to be some difference between the their their spouse and themselves, and how you can see bigger differences when you have the kind of like same

because the society will have treated you in very similar ways. Interesting, out of my close friends, like me, I have married someone who grew up in a different country, like two of my other very close friends, one of them married someone who grew up in Kyrgyzstan, one of them married someone who grew up in Denmark. And it's kind of interesting how we like all grew up in this like kind of like sheltered existence in Seattle, and then all ended up with people just very different backgrounds.

But I think it kind of resonates with what you're saying as well. Yeah, I mean, I'm still trying to figure my way out. But it does make me think about what does the brain like, what does our brain try to do when it does not have heuristics of comparison. And that's where like, you're, am I in one equilibrium state and someone is in other equilibrium state? And like, does that create dissonance and how I resolve try to resolve

that dissonance? It's like very interesting. I feel like we ended up in a pretty interesting place. But if you have more thoughts, I guess I'm curious where you kind of ended up, right? Because I feel like I do think that you, especially with people that you're working closely with, or people that you are maybe like that you're very close to, it's very difficult if you're in dissonant states, in like approaches that start to overlap with how you're like the thing that has brought you

together, like to give you some examples, like I feel like the thing that brought us together was kind of in some ways this notion, I think you wrote it recently and something I really liked. But like that that we're excited about changing our thinking in order to do problem solving, right? Like as we were like, oh, you know, maybe it's because we have this this analogy or this lens that's shaping our view. And now we can, we can change our thinking, right? And I feel like

that's something that like fundamentally at its core is like brought us into this journey together. You know, I have another friend who we also are playing like new games and like, they're always multiplayer games. And they're always just like, there's an element of learning new things. And it's also kind of this instructional element where my friend is always there's actually three of us. And so my friend is always doing the research on which game it is. And then he's

always teaching the other two of us. Right. And it's like, that is kind of how our relationship is predicated in some ways. And just interesting, it's like that has like that relationship that like thing that, you know, I do for so many, I don't know, five hours a week, say, right, it's kind of in that way. And I feel like if that started to change, like if that's why like whenever someone else is trying to introduce a new game, it's never really worked. Right. And so anyway, so

I kind of got deep into my examples there. But but I feel like right that I feel like there's this thing where like, you know, when we when we have had different like thoughts, right, when one of the like one of my other friends, the third friend wanted to like play go in a different direction, like we just kind of all stop playing together for a while. And I feel like if you and I started to like start to have different thinking about like how we thought about doing problem

solving and whether we like started to become more like, no, you know, I really feel like we've understood, I don't know, like, let's say we find a different, a similar sort of approach to design thinking to to do and kind of experience design, right? And we find this model and we're really excited about it. We're like, no, you know, this is the model. Like I feel like that would lead to some dissidents if the other person wasn't on that same place, like, and it would, you know,

cause distance or cause conflict, I don't know. So is that kind of where you where you ended up from our conversation? Or how do you how do you feel about that? No, that part I agree with, like what he just said, that if, if we had five or six common points between us, that, you know, in one way, shape or form, welding us together, if we try to break one of those off, would our relationship become weaker? Of course it would. But I think what I'm trying to

say is more like telling myself that I contain multitudes in a weird way. This is so interesting, because we often come around to this thing where what I'm thinking about applies to the self and what you are thinking about applies to relationship with other people. That's interesting. Well, to be fair, the framing was around relationships with other people, but I hear what you're saying. I mean, like,

my brain just went in that direction of like, I'm more like, I can have one kind of relationship with one person, and a different kind of relationship with another person in some ways, I guess. Even in the same sort of like, I don't know, skill set or like, like, you know, like attribute group is what you're saying. But it isn't the same skills, like to use it. Because like the relationship that I have with you, for example, whatever we are building together, it is different

fundamentally from what I am building with Chal. And our context is different. And how we are building it is also different. So for example, you are someone who's very, very comfortable with abstract thinking, you're very comfortable with uncertainty. And it's not that she isn't comfortable with abstract thinking or uncertainty. But her need for having something concrete is much greater. And her need for having something contained is also much greater.

Like for you, on the other hand, at least in my experience, the need for having something that is valuable in the world, on like a slightly larger level is much more. Yeah, I think that's fair. And I would say that like, I personally feel like I get to express one side of my personality with you and I get to express one side of my personality with her in terms of like, even how my professional self is. Because I have both of those parts as well.

I want to make small things that feel precious. And I also want to change the way problems are solved. It's really interesting. It's interesting that you don't feel like your relationships are built on certain things. And I guess in this case, like, you know, we're talking about your sister and me, right? So these are people you spend a lot of time with. And I'm sure there's lots of threads to the relationships. Like I feel like it's really exciting when you meet someone

who has a similar sort of attitude towards something that you also care about. And just like, it's kind of cool. And then I think, and now to maybe bring it into the negative, like something that I have found, especially with like people who have been my mentors and people who have been, who I've worked with like in older periods that like, you know, people's life circumstances have changed, especially people who you've worked with, right, like you connected on a certain

thing, especially you connected on a way of thinking, right? Like especially people you, in my experience, people you like to work with, it's because the delight they bring to problem solving or the delight they bring to like the challenges, the way that you kind of can resonate on those is really fun. And so I think it's just been interesting for me to see like, as now as that, like, as I don't have kind of as mentoring sort of relationships as much as I've gone, you know,

further in my career. And as some of my ex colleagues have retired, as I hang out with them, it's interesting where I feel like I'm like, Oh, there was this side of you that I really resonated with and I don't know how to engage it anymore. Right? Or I don't know how to like, and I don't know if maybe you are like, you're saying maybe they just have people change, right? And the way that they approach the world changes, the way they approach you may have changed, right?

But it's interesting to me that, or maybe I'll again frame it as a question where I think it's, I'm curious about how you feel like that, that you're, you're thinking and like the way you approach things, lets you resonate more with other people, as you kind of meet new people. And then also how you find that like, as that changes with some of your weaker bonds, does it kind of lead to, to just that bond kind of fading? Are you familiar with the concept of Half-Life?

Yeah, yeah, like in, yeah. Like in nuclear biology. Biological terms, yeah. Yeah. Right. It's this thing, like half of the atoms in this sample are going to go away in this many years. And I feel like it's similar for relationships with a more compounding factor of things elevate over time or they stagnate over time. So if there are relationships which have been elevating over time, which means that both of you have been traveling,

you have been on parallel tracks, you haven't diverged from each other, then you can imagine that over time, this is a relationship which has a longer Half-Life. And like it's in that category. And then there are relationships which are not going to be in that category. I have, I think when I was in college, I had this realization in college, I was a very social person. Like I knew so many people, so many people knew me. But I knew that most of these bonds will be gone

once I get out of college. And I have still like maintained a lot more bonds than other people have. But I feel like there is a slight stoic sense of whatever will leave will leave and whatever will stay will stay. Like I don't try to force it almost because I what I do try to do is like when people are precious to me, I try to make multiple bonds with them because those are harder. Like even if you lose one track, it's harder to lose another and another and another all at the

same time. Even at that point, you know, I'm sure there could be something. So for example, right now we are really close. I'm sure there would be something that I could do that would make you think I never want to talk to her ever again. I hope that I never do that, right? Like because I've had a friendship of maybe what 12, 13 years with somebody who I was really close to. And it just snapped in one day. And like, was it painful? Of course it was. But there was something there

which just made me think, okay, this is a must have for me. And I'm not gonna get I'm not gonna get this from this person anymore. On the other hand, there are relationships which have surprised me. I didn't expect it to last this long. I'm amazed that this has. And then I've had friends even from my college that I wasn't close to when I was in college, our paths crossed much later on like the queer friend that I'm talking about, we were not close when we were in college, we knew

each other, we were friends of friends. And then like, now we are really close. And it's very, it's an interesting space to be in where I just feel like it's more fluid, people will come in your life and go out of your life. Based on so many factors, you can only maybe control like 20% of a relationship. The other person controls another 20%. And then the rest of it is circumstance. Interesting. Like that's how I feel about it, at least it could be, you know, I'm just giving myself

excuses. No, I think that makes sense. I mean, it's just a lot to think about, which is always a nice place to end. I feel like we're always ending in a place of a lot to think about. Yeah, I feel like this might be a long one though. Yeah, I had a lot of questions. Sorry. But okay, so shall we say our bye's also? Okay. Yeah, this was a very good one. Bye. Bye. I'll see you next time. Bye. See you soon.

Thanks for listening to this episode of Thinking on Thinking. Our theme music is by Steve Gomes and you can find a link to it in the show notes.

Heard something that got you thinking? Tell us where it took you.